Kerala can revive barren and fallow agricultural lands only if land development and wildlife control move together. The state already has active revival efforts such as the NAWO-DHAN collaborative farming model and district-level fallow land initiatives, but these must now be strengthened in Thiruvananthapuram as a model with tighter implementation and better protection from crop-raiding animals.
A large area of cultivable land in Kerala is still lying unused, while farmers continue to lose crops to wild boars, porcupines, monkeys, and peacocks. Official and media reports show that Kerala has been spending heavily on compensation, but compensation alone does not prevent the next round of losses. In Thiruvananthapuram, the opportunity is to convert idle or underused land into productive farms before it slips permanently out of cultivation.
The State should create a district-level fallow land revival mission for Thiruvananthapuram with village-wise mapping, land banking, and a single-window support system. Kerala has already announced fallow-land mapping and has also used Panchayat-led and self-help group models in earlier revival programmes, so the new step should be to make these systems faster and more transparent. Landowners who do not want to cultivate should be able to lease land safely to farmer groups, Kudumbashree units, or registered agri-enterprises through simple service agreements, without fear of losing ownership. The government should also support crop choices suited to each locality, instead of forcing one model everywhere.
Corporates can make a major difference through CSR and impact investment in land restoration, micro-irrigation, nurseries, fencing, storage, and processing units. This is especially useful in Kerala, where fragmented holdings make it hard for individual farmers to invest in infrastructure on their own. Companies can partner with farmer producer organisations and cooperative groups to offer buy-back arrangements, helping farmers earn stable returns after land is brought back into production. They can also support digital farm mapping, soil testing, advisory services, and post-harvest logistics so that cultivation becomes a business, not just a seasonal activity.
Kerala needs a prevention-first wildlife strategy, not only compensation after damage. The forest department has already documented crop loss from human-animal conflict, and reports show that compensation outflows are large, which means the problem is persistent rather than occasional. For Thiruvananthapuram, the practical response should include solar fencing, stronger boundary protection, trenching where suitable, and rapid-response teams that act when repeated raids begin. The State should also push for quicker compensation and better district-level monitoring so that farmers do not abandon cultivation after one or two bad seasons.
Thiruvananthapuram should be positioned as a model district for peri-urban farming ( growing food and other crops right on the edge of a city to sell in urban markets), coconut-based systems, vegetables, and mixed cropping on unused land near towns and institutions. The district can use the presence of government offices, schools, religious institutions, and private landholders to create farm clusters on idle plots. This district is also well placed for model demonstrations in protected cultivation, rooftop farming, and short-cycle vegetable production, especially where land is small or fragmented. The message here should be simple: idle land near the capital city must become food-producing land again.
A practical roadmap suggestion I can make is to Map every fallow plot in the two districts and classify it by water access, soil type, and wildlife risk. Group nearby plots into farm clusters so small fragmented holdings can be cultivated together. Offer landowners guaranteed lease terms and farmers guaranteed access to basic services. Install protection first in wildlife-prone zones before scaling cultivation. Link the harvest to storage, processing, and market tie-ups so the revived land generates income, not just output.
Kerala does not need to choose between land revival and wildlife protection; it needs both at the same time. If Thiruvananthapuram show that barren land can be made productive and that farmers can be protected from animal raids, the state will have a model other districts can follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment